On 11.12.2020 19:27, Pavel Stehule wrote:
pá 11. 12. 2020 v 17:05 odesílatel Konstantin Knizhnik
<k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru <mailto:k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru>> napsal:
On 11.12.2020 18:40, Pavel Stehule wrote:
is not correct. It makes it not possible to superuser to
disable triggers for all users.
pg_database_ownercheck returns true for superuser always.
Sorry, but I consider different case: when normal user is
connected to the database.
In this case pg_database_ownercheck returns false and trigger is
not disabled, isn't it?
My idea was to reduce necessary rights to database owners. But you
have a true, so only superuser can create event trigger, so this
feature cannot be used in DBaaS environments, and then my original
idea was wrong.
Also GUCs are not associated with any database. So I do not
understand why this check of database ownership is relevant
at all?
What kind of protection violation we want to prevent?
It seems to be obvious that normal user should not be able to
prevent trigger execution because this triggers may be used
to enforce some security policies.
If trigger was created by user itself, then it can drop or
disable it using ALTER statement. GUC is not needed for it.
when you cannot connect to the database, then you cannot do
ALTER. In DBaaS environments lot of users has not superuser rights.
But only superusers can set login triggers, right?
So only superuser can make a mistake in this trigger. But he have
enough rights to recover this error. Normal users are not able to
define on connection triggers and
should not have rights to disable them.
yes, it is true
Pavel
--
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional:http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
So what's next?
I see three options:
1. Do not introduce GUC for disabling all event triggers (especially
taken in account that them are disabled by default).
Return back to the patch
on_connect_event_trigger_WITH_SUGGESTED_UPDATES.patch with
"disable_client_connection_trigger"
and make it true by default (to eliminate any overhead for users which
are not using on logintriggers).
2. Have two GUCS: "disable_client_connection_trigger" and
"disable_event_triggers".
3. Implement some mechanism for caching presence of event triggers in
shared memory.
--
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company