On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 03:15:12PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Please note that this case fails with your patch, but the presence of > IF NOT EXISTS should ensure that we don't fail and issue a NOTICE > instead, no? Taking this case specifically (OK, I am playing with > the rules a bit to insert data into the relation itself, still), this > query may finish by adding tuples to the table whose creation should > have been bypassed but the query got executed and inserted tuples. > That's one example of behavior that may be confusing. There may be > others, but it seems to me that it may be simpler to execute or even > plan the query at all if the relation already exists.
Er.. Sorry. I meant here to *not* execute or even *not* plan the query at all if the relation already exists. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
