On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:07 AM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:43 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for looking!  Pushed.
> >
> > At this point the cfbot is going to start complaining that the last-posted
> > patch in this thread no longer applies.  Unless you have a new patch set
> > nearly ready to post, I think we should close the CF entry as RWF, and
> > then you can open a new one when you're ready.
> >
>
> Actually, the cfbot shouldn't be complaining, as my last-posted patch
> still seems to apply cleanly on the latest code (with your pushed
> patch), and all tests pass.
> Hopefully it's OK to let it roll over to the next CF with the WOA status.
> I am actively working on processing the feedback and updating the
> patch, and hope to post an update next week sometime.
>

Posting an updated set of patches.

Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment: v20-0001-in_hot_standby-and-transaction_read_only-reportable-GUCs.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v20-0002-Enhance-libpq-target_session_attrs.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to