On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 03:46:19PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > > So this comes down to 5 items, as per the attached. Thoughts? > > These items look fine to me, except this bit seems a bit awkward: > > + Note that the delayed indexing technique used for <acronym>GIN</acronym> > + (see <xref linkend="gin-fast-update"/> for details) makes this advice > + less necessary, but for very large updates it may still be best to > + drop and recreate the index. > > Less necessary than what? Maybe instead write > > When fastupdate is enabled (see ...), the penalty is much less than > when it is not. But for very large updates it may still be best to > drop and recreate the index.
Thanks, that's indeed better. I used your wording, looked at that again, and applied that. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
