On 26/11/2020 06:30, Krunal Bauskar wrote:
Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
------------------------------------------------------------
* Spin-Lock is known to have a significant effect on performance
with increasing scalability.
* Existing Spin-Lock implementation for ARM is sub-optimal due to
use of TAS (test and swap)
* TAS is implemented on ARM as load-store so even if the lock is not free,
store operation will execute to replace the same value.
This redundant operation (mainly store) is costly.
* CAS is implemented on ARM as load-check-store-check that means if the
lock is not free, check operation, post-load will cause the loop to
return there-by saving on costlier store operation. [1]
Can you add some code comments to explain that why CAS is cheaper than
TAS on ARM?
Is there some official ARM documentation, like a programmer's reference
manual or something like that, that would show a reference
implementation of a spinlock on ARM? It would be good to refer to an
authoritative source on this.
- Heikki
