On 2020-Nov-26, Fujii Masao wrote: > On the second thought, walsender doesn't wait forever unless > wal_sender_timeout is disabled, even in the case in discussion? > Or if there is the case where wal_sender_timeout doesn't work expectedly, > we might need to fix that at first.
Hmm, no, it doesn't wait forever in that sense; tracing with the debugger shows that the process is looping continuously.
