>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> I guess that's close enough; this should suffice then. Tom> Looks about right. Not sure if we need to bother with a regression Tom> test case; once that's in, it'd be hard to break it. We could check the EXPLAIN output (since the Materialize node would show up), but it's not easy to get stable plans since the choice of which path to put on the outside is not fixed. Based on what I found when actually testing the code, it probably wouldn't be worth the effort. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
