On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:51 PM Phil Florent <philflor...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I have a question about parallel plans. I also posted it on the general list
> but perhaps it's a question for hackers. Here is my test case :
>
>
> explain
> select count(*)
> from (select
> n1
> from drop_me
> union all
> values(1)) ua;
>
>
> QUERY PLAN
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Aggregate (cost=2934739.24..2934739.25 rows=1 width=8)
> -> Append (cost=0.00..2059737.83 rows=70000113 width=32)
> -> Seq Scan on drop_me (cost=0.00..1009736.12 rows=70000112 width=6)
> -> Subquery Scan on "*SELECT* 2" (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=32)
> -> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=4)
> JIT:
> Functions: 4
> Options: Inlining true, Optimization true, Expressions true, Deforming true
>
>
> No parallel plan, 2s6
>
>
> I read the documentation but I don't get the reason of the "noparallel" seq
> scan of drop_me in the last case ?
>
Without debugging this, it looks to me that the UNION type resolution
isn't working as well as it possibly could in this case, for the
generation of a parallel plan. I found that with a minor tweak to your
SQL, either for the table creation or query, it will produce a
parallel plan.
Noting that currently you're creating the drop_me table with a
"numeric" column, you can either:
(1) Change the table creation
FROM:
create unlogged table drop_me as select generate_series(1,7e7) n1;
TO:
create unlogged table drop_me as select generate_series(1,7e7)::int n1;
OR
(2) Change the query
FROM:
explain
select count(*)
from (select
n1
from drop_me
union all
values(1)) ua;
TO:
explain
select count(*)
from (select
n1
from drop_me
union all
values(1::numeric)) ua;
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finalize Aggregate (cost=821152.71..821152.72 rows=1 width=8)
-> Gather (cost=821152.50..821152.71 rows=2 width=8)
Workers Planned: 2
-> Partial Aggregate (cost=820152.50..820152.51 rows=1 width=8)
-> Parallel Append (cost=0.00..747235.71 rows=29166714 width=0)
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0)
-> Parallel Seq Scan on drop_me
(cost=0.00..601402.13 rows=29166713 width=0)
(7 rows)
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia
