Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 2020-11-12 23:28, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm on board with pulling these now --- 8.2 to v14 is plenty of
>> deprecation notice. However, the patch seems incomplete in that
>> the code support for these is still there -- look for
>> RTOldContainedByStrategyNumber and RTOldContainsStrategyNumber.
>> Admittedly, there's not much to be removed except some case labels,
>> but it still seems like we oughta do that to avoid future confusion.
> Yeah, the stuff in gistproc.c should be removed now. But I wonder what
> the mentions in brin_inclusion.c are and whether or how they should be
> removed.
I think those probably got cargo-culted in there at some point.
They're visibly dead code, because there are no pg_amop entries
for BRIN opclasses with amopstrategy 13 or 14.
This comment that you removed in 2f70fdb06 is suspicious:
# we could, but choose not to, supply entries for strategies 13 and 14
I'm guessing that somebody was vacillating about whether it'd be
a feature to support these old operator names in BRIN, and
eventually didn't, but forgot to remove the code support.
regards, tom lane
