Hi, On 2020-11-02 11:03:29 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > While looking at the parallel copy patches, it started to annoy me how large > copy.c is.
Agreed. > There isn't much common code between COPY FROM and COPY TO, so I propose > that we split copy.c into two: copyfrom.c and copyto.c. See attached. I thin > that's much nicer. Not quite convinced that's the right split - or perhaps there's just more potential. My feeling is that splitting out all the DML related code would make the code considerably easier to read. Regards, Andres
