Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > If we're going to change it I think we need an updated patch that covers > pg_dump. (Even if we argue that pg_dump would not normally dump this > variable, keeping it up to date with respect to GUC_LIST_QUOTE seems > proper.)
Right, I was definitely assuming that that would happen.
regards, tom lane
