Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Hmm, next question: should we backpatch a fix for this? (This applies
> all the way back to 11.) If we do, then we would change behavior of
> partition creation. It's hard to see that the current behavior is
> desirable ... and I think anybody who would have come across this, would
> wish it behaved the other way. But still -- it would definitely be a
> behavior change.
The behavior change seems like it'd be an improvement in a vacuum,
but I wonder how it would interact with catalog contents left behind
by the old misbehavior. Also, would we expect pg_dump to try to do
anything to clean up the mess? If so, allowing a back branch to have
had more than one behavior would complicate that greatly.
regards, tom lane
