On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 17:56, tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com
<tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com>
> > It seems to respond to a statement-cancel signal immediately while
> > waiting for a coming byte. However, seems to wait forever while
> > waiting a space in send-buffer. (Is that mean the session will be
> > stuck if it sends a large chunk of bytes while the network is down?)
>
> What part makes you worried about that? libpq's send processing?
>
> I've just examined pgfdw_cancel_query(), too. As below, it uses a hidden 30
> second timeout. After all, postgres_fdw also relies on timeout already.
It uses the timeout but it's also cancellable before the timeout. See
we call CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in pgfdw_get_cleanup_result().
>
>
> > After receiving a signal, it closes the problem connection. So the
> > local session is usable after that but the fiailed remote sessions are
> > closed and created another one at the next use.
>
> I couldn't see that the problematic connection is closed when the
> cancellation fails... Am I looking at a wrong place?
>
> /*
> * If connection is already unsalvageable, don't touch it
> * further.
> */
> if (entry->changing_xact_state)
> break;
>
I guess Horiguchi-san refereed the following code in pgfdw_xact_callback():
/*
* If the connection isn't in a good idle state, discard it to
* recover. Next GetConnection will open a new connection.
*/
if (PQstatus(entry->conn) != CONNECTION_OK ||
PQtransactionStatus(entry->conn) != PQTRANS_IDLE ||
entry->changing_xact_state)
{
elog(DEBUG3, "discarding connection %p", entry->conn);
disconnect_pg_server(entry);
}
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
