David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes:
> It would be good to hear Onder's case to see if he has a good argument
> for having a vested interest in pg13 not failing this way with assets
> enabled.
Yeah, some context for this report would be a good thing.
(BTW, am I wrong to suppose that the same case fails the same
way in our older branches? Certainly that Assert has been there
a long time.)
> I guess we could resolve that concern by just changing the failing
> assert to become: Assert(outer_skip_rows <= outer_rows ||
> isinf(outer_rows));
I can't really object to just weakening the Assert a tad.
My thoughts would have run towards checking for the NaN though.
regards, tom lane
