Right after I sent that I realized that sspi-group was a bad idea, not sure if that's even a thing. Tried to cancel as it was still in moderation, but it made it through anyways! You are right, it is very windows specific. I can make it windows-group as you said, and resubmit.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:32 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Russell Foster <russell.foster.cod...@gmail.com> writes: > > I understand your concerns overall, and the solution you propose seems > > reasonable. But are we just using "windows-group" because the code is not > > there today to check for a user in another OS group? > > It's not clear to me whether Windows groups have exact equivalents in > other OSes. If we think the concept is generic, I'd be okay with > spelling the keyword system-group or the like. The patch you > proposed looked pretty Windows-specific though. Somebody with more > SSPI knowledge than me would have to opine on whether "sspi-group" > is a reasonable name. > > regards, tom lane >
