On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 6:35 PM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 2:11 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, I think we should go ahead and fix that up front. Here's a
> > version with a commit message.
>
> I've checked it and tested it, and it looks fine to me.
> Also, it seems to align with the gripe in the old comment about width
> ("XXX this is totally wrong: we should report zero if no RETURNING
> ...").
> I'm happy for you to commit it.
Pushed, though I left most of that comment there because the width
estimate still needs work when you do use RETURNING. At least we now
have rows=0 for queries without RETURNING, which was a bigger problem
for your patch.
