Thanks for investigating this, Noah. On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 06:13, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > > gram.o was it. (The way I rebuilt gram.o also rebuilt parser.o and scan.o, > > but those seem far less likely.) > > This suggests that the problem is misoptimization of gram.y's > makeOrderedSetArgs:
It would be interesting to see gram.s from both cc99baa4~1 and cc99baa4. David
