David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes:
> Yeah, I understand that part. The pain I was talking about was
> writing a patch for master, trying to apply it to the previous version
> only to find it does not apply. After fixing it up for that version
> trying to apply that patch to the version before that and getting more
> conflicts. Repeating that down to our earliest supported version is
> something I'd really love to never have to do again.
Tell me about it :-(. I've spent countless hours on that sort
of activity. So I really dislike changing an API and then changing
it again in the next release.
regards, tom lane
