Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:02 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Well, I agree with Peter to that extent, but my opinion is that *none*
>> of these cases ought to be errors. What we're doing here is performing
>> an implicit assignment-level coercion of the expression to the type of
>> the column, and changing the collation is allowed as part of that:
>>
>> regression=# create table foo (f1 text collate "C");
>> CREATE TABLE
>> regression=# insert into foo values ('a' COLLATE "POSIX");
>> INSERT 0 1
>> regression=# update foo set f1 = 'b' COLLATE "POSIX";
>> UPDATE 1
>>
>> So I find it completely inconsistent that the partitioning logic
>> complains about equivalent cases.
> My perhaps wrong impression was that the bound expression that is
> specified when creating a partition is not as such being *assigned* to
> the key column, but now that I think about it some more, that doesn't
> matter.
>> I think we should just rip the
>> whole thing out, as per the attached draft. This causes several
>> regression test results to change, but AFAICS those are only there
>> to exercise the error tests that I think we should get rid of.
> Yeah, I can see no other misbehavior resulting from this.
OK, I'll clean up the regression test cases and push that.
(Although this could be claimed to be a bug, I do not feel
a need to back-patch the behavioral change.)
regards, tom lane
