On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 2:03 AM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I noticed that we are not having any check for skipping temporary > table insertion. >
> You should also include temporary tables check here, as parallel > workers might not have access to temporary tables. > Thanks Vignesh, you are right, I need to test this and add it to the list of further exclusions that the patch needs to check for. Hopefully I can provide an updated patch soon that caters for these additional identified cases. Regards, Greg Nancarrow Fujitsu Australia
