On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:00:04PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > The attached removes it in favor of using palloc() et.al directly. Is there > any reason to keep it around still?
I doubt that anybody has been compiling with PX_OWN_ALLOC in the last years, so let's remove this abstraction. And +1 for your patch. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
