On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 19:08, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > I ran another scale=5 TPCH benchmark on v4 against f859c2ffa using gcc > 9.3. I'm unable to see any gains with this, however, the results were > pretty noisy. I only ran pgbench for 60 seconds per query. I'll likely > need to run that a bit longer. I'll do that tonight.
I've attached the results of a TPCH scale=5 run master (f859c2ffa) vs master + elog_ereport_attribute_cold_v4.patch It does not look great. The patched version seems to have done about 1.17% less work than master did. David
tpch_scale5_elog_ereport_cold_v4_vs_master_10min.ods
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet
