On 2020-Sep-21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oh wait, I forgot about the fmgrprotos.h discrepancy.
>
> I wrote:
> > It strikes me that a low-cost workaround would be to rename these
> > C functions. There's no law that their C names must match the
> > SQL names.
>
> Here's a proposed patch to fix it that way.
pgtypes_numeric.h still contains
typedef struct
{
int ndigits; /* number of digits in digits[] - can be 0! */
int weight; /* weight of first digit */
int rscale; /* result scale */
int dscale; /* display scale */
int sign; /* NUMERIC_POS, NUMERIC_NEG, or NUMERIC_NAN */
NumericDigit *buf; /* start of alloc'd space for digits[] */
NumericDigit *digits; /* decimal digits */
} numeric;
... isn't this more likely to create a typedef entry than merely a
function name?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
