Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2020-Sep-15, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After further thought, I concluded that's a clearly superior solution,
>> so 0001 attached does it like that. After noting that the enum values
>> are in the opposite direction from how I thought they went, I realized
>> that "increase_level" might be a bit ambiguous, so I now propose to
>> call it pg_logging_increase_verbosity.
> I like this better too ... I've wished for extra-verbose messages from
> pg_dump in the past, and this now allows me to add something should I
> want them again.
Pushed, thanks for reviewing.
regards, tom lane
