Re: Dubious code in pg_rewind's process_target_file()

[Tom Lane]

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> writes:
> On 06/09/2020 18:06, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I propose to remove the lstat() in the back branches, but not touch
>> HEAD so as not to cause extra merge effort for your patch.

> Thanks! Feel free to push it to HEAD, too, the merge conflict will be 
> trivial to resolve.

OK, done that way.

                        regards, tom lane