On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:26:03PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> The 0001 patch isn't strictly necessary but it seems reasonable to address >> the >> various ways OpenSSL was spelled out in the docs while at updating the SSL >> portions. It essentially ensures that markup around OpenSSL and SSL is used >> consistently. I didn't address the linelengths being too long in this patch >> to >> make review easier instead. > > I'll take a look.
Adding a <productname> markup around OpenSSL in the docs makes things consistent. +1. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
