On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:47 PM Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
> Greetings, > > * Dave Page (dp...@pgadmin.org) wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 5:29 PM Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > > * Dave Page (dp...@pgadmin.org) wrote: > > > > Attached is a patch against 12.4 for the build system in case anyone > > > wants > > > > to play (I'll do it properly against the head branch later). I'm > guessing > > > > this will work for < 12, as with 12 I'm now getting the following > which > > > > looks like it's related to GSS encryption: > > > > > > > > "C:\Users\dpage\Downloads\postgresql-12.4\pgsql.sln" (default target) > > > (1) -> > > > > "C:\Users\dpage\Downloads\postgresql-12.4\pgcrypto.vcxproj" (default > > > > target) (2) -> > > > > "C:\Users\dpage\Downloads\postgresql-12.4\postgres.vcxproj" (default > > > > target) (3) -> > > > > (Link target) -> > > > > be-secure-gssapi.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol > setenv > > > > referenced in function secure_open_gssapi > > > > [C:\Users\dpage\Downloads\postgresql-12.4\postgres.vcxproj] > > > > .\Release\postgres\postgres.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved > > > > externals [C:\Users\dpage\Downloads\postgresql-12.4\postgres.vcxproj] > > > > > > > > I'll dig into that some more. > > > > > > Yes, that'd be in the GSSENC code, which I hadn't been expecting to be > > > used under Windows. If you're successful, I don't have any issue > > > helping to make that work, though I'm curious if you're trying to build > > > with MIT KfW (which is rather ancient these days, being based on krb5 > > > 1.13 and not updated since..) or with a more current release...? > > > > I'm currently using the KFW 4.1 build from MIT. I've tried building it > > myself but it requires a very old toolchain (which defeated the point of > > what I was trying to do at the time). > > > I haven't yet looked to see if the source for krb5-1.8.2 will build or > even > > has the right bits in it for Windows - as I'm sure you know MIT seem to > > maintain an entirely different version for Windows for which I assume > > there's a reason. > > I'm a bit confused as to why you'd consider trying 1.8.2- did you mean > 1.18.2 there, perhaps..? Yes, typo. > That's what I would think to try, since, as I > understand it from following the Kerberos Dev list (which is pretty > responsive...) has been updated to work with newer Windows build > toolchains. > OK, will try to do that tomorrow. Thanks! > > > > Of course, it'd be good to get a buildfarm animal in place that's > > > actually testing this if we're going to make it work. > > > > Fixing the config on hamerkop should deal with that I think. Though I am > > confused as to why the Buildfarm UI thinks it has Kerberos support > enabled > > - did we change the config parameter from krb5 to gss some time prior to > > 9.5? If so, that could explain it. > > Looks to be run by SRA OSS.. Perhaps reaching out to them to ask about > it would help? > > > > Regarding the setenv() call, should be able to use pgwin32_putenv() in > > > place on Windows, I'd think..? > > > > Right, I imagine so. It's on my todo... > > Alright. > > Thanks, > > Stephen > -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
