On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:14 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > from the archive
Ahh, so perhaps that's the key. > I've tested this applied on 6ca547cf75ef6e922476c51a3fb5e253eef5f1b6, > and the failure seems fairly similar to what I reported before, except > that now it happened right at the very beginning. Thanks, will see if I can work out why. My newer version probably has the same problem.
