On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:56 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Yeah, I agree that there are way too many copies here. CREATE OPERATOR > seems sufficient. It also seems like we should just rewrite the typeconv > and drop_operator examples to use some other operator. We'll have > to do that eventually anyway, so why not now, instead of visiting those > places twice?
Hmm, that's an idea. I think it would be reasonable to rewrite the typeconv.sgml one, but the one in drop_operator.sgml seems like it could just be dropped. Its only purpose seems to be to demonstrate how to drop a right-unary operator vs. a left-unary operator, but I venture to guess that anyone smart enough to make any sort of effective use of DROP OPERATOR could probably draw the necessary inferences anyway. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
