Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2020-08-25 18:59, Tom Lane wrote:
>> For some of these, there's an argument for keeping the unused parameter
>> for consistency with sibling functions that do use it. Not sure how
>> important that is, though.
> I had meant to exclude cases like this from this patch set. If you see
> a case like this in *this* patch set, please point it out.
I'd been thinking specifically of the changes in pg_backup_archiver.c.
But now that I look around a bit further, there's already very little
consistency in that file about whether to pass the ArchiveHandle* pointer
everywhere. So no further objection here.
regards, tom lane
