From: Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> > I agree to expose the number of WAL write caused by full of WAL buffers. > It's helpful when tuning wal_buffers size. Haribabu separated that number > into two fields in his patch; one is the number of WAL write by backend, > and another is by background processes and workers. But I'm not sure > how useful such separation is. I'm ok with just one field for that number.
I agree with you. I don't think we need to separate the numbers for foreground processes and background ones. WAL buffer is a single resource. So "Writes due to full WAL buffer are happening. We may be able to boost performance by increasing wal_buffers" would be enough. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
