On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:50 AM Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 3:06 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 2020-Aug-19, Amit Langote wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 4:25 PM kato-...@fujitsu.com > > > <kato-...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, August 5, 2020 9:43 AM I wrote: > > > > > I'll report the result before the end of August . > > > > > > > > I test v2-0001-build-partdesc-memcxt.patch at 9a9db08ae4 and it is ok. > > Fwiw, I am fine with applying the memory-leak fix in all branches down > to v12 if we are satisfied with the implementation.
I have revised the above patch slightly to introduce a variable for the condition whether to use a temporary memory context. -- Amit Langote EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v3-0001-build-partdesc-memcxt.patch
Description: Binary data
