Thanks for suggestion Ashutosh, I have done testing around these suggestion and found no issues. I will continue testing same with updated patch posted on this thread.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 12:45 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Rajkumar for testing the patch. > > Here are some of the additional test-cases that I would suggest you to > execute, if possible: > > 1) You may try running the test-cases that you have executed so far > with SR setup and see if the changes are getting reflected on the > standby. > > 2) You may also try running some concurrent test-cases for e.g. try > running these functions with VACUUM or some other sql commands > (preferable DML commands) in parallel. > > 3) See what happens when you pass some invalid tids (containing > invalid block or offset number) to these functions. You may also try > running these functions on the same tuple repeatedly and see the > behaviour. > > ... > > -- > With Regards, > Ashutosh Sharma > EnterpriseDB:http://www.enterprisedb.com Thanks & Regards, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
