On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 11:05:43AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 2:17 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: >> It's always been like that, but I am not going backport, for fear of >> breaking existing applications. If a program reads the WAL, and would >> actually need to do something with commit records dropping relations, >> that seems like such a common scenario that the author should've thought >> about it and handled it even without the flag reminding about it. Fixing >> it in master ought to be enough. > > +1 for doing it in master only. Even if someone comes up with such a > scenario for back-branches, we can revisit our decision to backport > this but like you, I also don't see any pressing need to do it now.
+1. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
