On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 08:47:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Should we back-patch that? Usually I figure that people might want > to build back PG branches on newer platforms at some point, so that > it's useful to apply portability fixes across-the-board. On the > other hand, since it's only a compiler warning, maybe it's not worth > the trouble.
Not sure that's worth the trouble as long as people don't complain about it directly, and it does not prevent the contrib module to work. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
