On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 7:33 PM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:39 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The other two messages for reporting unused items and dead items > > remain the same. Hence, with above change, we would be reporting the > > following 4 messages: > > > > NOTICE: skipping all the tids in block %u for relation "%s" because > > the block number is out of range > > > > NOTICE: skipping tid (%u, %u) for relation "%s" because the item > > number is out of range for this block > > > > NOTICE: skipping tid (%u, %u) for relation "%s" because it is marked dead > > > > NOTICE: skipping tid (%u, %u) for relation "%s" because it is marked unused > > > > Please let me know if you are okay with the above changes or not? > > That seems broadly reasonable, but I would suggest phrasing the first > message like this: > > skipping block %u for relation "%s" because the block number is out of range >
Okay, thanks for the confirmation. I'll do that. -- With Regards, Ashutosh Sharma EnterpriseDB:http://www.enterprisedb.com
