On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:51 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 12:33:48PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > >On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 9:55 AM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> The patches were not applying because of the recent commits. > >> I have rebased the patch over head & attached. > >> > >I rebased v2-0006-Parallel-Copy-For-Binary-Format-Files.patch. > > > >Putting together all the patches rebased on to the latest commit > >b8fdee7d0ca8bd2165d46fb1468f75571b706a01. Patches from 0001 to 0005 > >are rebased by Vignesh, that are from the previous mail and the patch > >0006 is rebased by me. > > > >Please consider this patch set for further review. > > > > I'd suggest incrementing the version every time an updated version is > submitted, even if it's just a rebased version. It makes it clearer > which version of the code is being discussed, etc.
Sure, we will take care of this when we are sending the next set of patches. Regards, Vignesh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
