Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 1:30 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm strongly tempted to convert the trailing Assert to an actual
>> test-and-elog, too, but didn't do so here.
> I was thinking about that, too. +1 for taking that step.
Will do.
In the longer term, it's annoying that we have no test methodology
for this other than "manually set a breakpoint here". If we're going
to allow plan-relevant DDL changes to happen with less than full table
lock, I think we need to improve that. I spent a little bit of time
just now trying to build an isolationtester case for this, and failed
completely. So I wonder if we can create some sort of test module that
allows capture of a plan tree and then execution of that plan tree later
(even after relcache inval would normally have forced replanning).
Obviously that could not be a normal SQL-accessible feature, because
some types of invals would make the plan completely wrong, but for
testing purposes it'd be mighty helpful to check that a stale plan
still works.
regards, tom lane
