> 30 июля 2020 г., в 06:26, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> написал(а):
> 
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 6:55 PM Andrey M. Borodin <x4...@yandex-team.ru> 
> wrote:
>> Thanks! Fixed.
> 
> It's not a bug, but I think those 64 bit constants should be wrapped
> in UINT64CONST(), following our convention.
Thanks, fixed!

> I'm confused about these two patches: 0001 introduces
> gist_point_fastcmp(), but then 0002 changes it to gist_bbox_fastcmp().
> Maybe you intended to keep both of them?  Also 0002 seems to have
> fixups for 0001 squashed into it.
Indeed, that were fixups: point converted to GiST representation is a bbox 
already, and the function expects only bboxes.

Also I've fixed some mismerges in documentation.

Thanks!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Attachment: v10-0001-Add-sort-support-for-point-gist_point_sortsuppor.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v10-0002-Implement-GiST-build-using-sort-support.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to