On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:30:50PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 07:47:39PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > > In light of the mixed reception, I am withdrawing this proposal. > > I'd like to reopen this. Reception was mixed, but more in favor than against. > Also, variations on the idea trade some problems for others and may be more > attractive. The taxonomy of variations has three important dimensions: > > Interaction with dump/restore (including pg_upgrade) options: > a. If the schema has a non-default ACL, dump/restore reproduces it. > Otherwise, the new default prevails. > b. Dump/restore always reproduces the schema ACL.
I am worried that someone _slightly_ modifies the ACL permissions on the schema, and we reproduce it, and they think they are secure, but they are not. I guess for the public, and change would be to make it more secure, so maybe this works, but it seems tricky. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
