On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:42 AM David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 11:36, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So, with the current users, we'd stand to lose more than we'd gain > > from doing it that way. > > FWIW, I'd be ok with just: > > - * The element type is required to contain a "uint32 status" member. > + * The element type is required to contain an integer-based > "status" member > + * which can store the range of values defined in the SH_STATUS enum.
Thanks for the correction. Pushed.
