On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 16:02, Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Justin. > > On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 11:47, Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 04:55:14PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > Bcc: > > > Subject: Re: display offset along with block number in vacuum errors > > > Reply-To: > > > In-Reply-To: > > > <cakytnapljjaarw0uebby6g1o0lrzks7ra5n46bfh+nfwsoy...@mail.gmail.com> > > > > whoops > > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 12:35:17AM +0530, Mahendra Singh Thalor wrote: > > > > > Here: > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1924,14 +1932,22 @@ lazy_vacuum_page(Relation onerel, BlockNumber > > > > > blkno, Buffer buffer, > > > > > BlockNumber tblk; > > > > > OffsetNumber toff; > > > > > ItemId itemid; > > > > > + LVSavedErrInfo loc_saved_err_info; > > > > > > > > > > tblk = > > > > > ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(&dead_tuples->itemptrs[tupindex]); > > > > > if (tblk != blkno) > > > > > break; /* past end > > > > > of tuples for this block */ > > > > > toff = > > > > > ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber(&dead_tuples->itemptrs[tupindex]); > > > > > + > > > > > + /* Update error traceback information */ > > > > > + update_vacuum_error_info(vacrelstats, > > > > > &loc_saved_err_info, VACUUM_ERRCB_PHASE_VACUUM_HEAP, > > > > > + > > > > > blkno, toff); > > > > > itemid = PageGetItemId(page, toff); > > > > > ItemIdSetUnused(itemid); > > > > > unused[uncnt++] = toff; > > > > > + > > > > > + /* Revert to the previous phase information for error > > > > > traceback */ > > > > > + restore_vacuum_error_info(vacrelstats, > > > > > &loc_saved_err_info); > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why you use restore_vacuum_error_info() at all. It's > > > > > already > > > > > called at the end of lazy_vacuum_page() (and others) to allow > > > > > functions to > > > > > clean up after their own state changes, rather than requiring callers > > > > > to do it. > > > > > I don't think you should use it in a loop, nor introduce another > > > > > LVSavedErrInfo. > > > > > > > > > > Since phase and blkno are already set, I think you should just set > > > > > vacrelstats->offnum = toff, rather than calling > > > > > update_vacuum_error_info(). > > > > > Similar to whats done in lazy_vacuum_heap(): > > > > > > > > > > tblk = > > > > > ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(&vacrelstats->dead_tuples->itemptrs[tupindex]); > > > > > vacrelstats->blkno = tblk; > > > > > > > > Fixed. > > > > > > I rearead this thread and I think the earlier suggestion from Masahiko was > > > right. The loop around dead_tuples only does ItemIdSetUnused() which > > > updates > > > the page, which has already been read from disk. On my suggestion, your > > > v2 > > > patch sets offnum directly, but now I think it's not useful to set at all, > > > since the whole page is manipulated by PageRepairFragmentation() and > > > log_heap_clean(). An error there would misleadingly say "..at offset > > > number > > > MM", but would always show the page's last offset, and not the offset > > > where an > > > error occured. > > > > This makes me question whether offset numbers are ever useful during > > VACUUM_HEAP, since the real work is done a page at a time (not tuple) or by > > internal functions that don't update vacrelstats->offno. Note that my > > initial > > problem report that led to the errcontext implementation was an ERROR in > > heap > > *scan* (not vacuum). So an offset number at that point would've been > > sufficient. > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190808012436.gg11...@telsasoft.com > > > > I mentioned that lazy_check_needs_freeze() should save and restore the > > errinfo, > > so an error in heap_page_prune() (for example) doesn't get the wrong offset > > associated with it. > > > > So see the attached changes on top of your v2 patch. > > Actually I was waiting for review comments from committer and other > people also and was planning to send a patch after that. I already > fixed your comments in my offline patch and was waiting for more > comments. Anyway, thanks for delta patch. > > Here, attaching v3 patch for review.
Thank you for updating the patch! Here are my comments on v3 patch: @@ -2024,6 +2033,11 @@ lazy_check_needs_freeze(Buffer buf, bool *hastup) if (PageIsNew(page) || PageIsEmpty(page)) return false; + /* Update error traceback information */ + update_vacuum_error_info(vacrelstats, &saved_err_info, + VACUUM_ERRCB_PHASE_SCAN_HEAP, vacrelstats->blkno, + InvalidOffsetNumber); + maxoff = PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(page); for (offnum = FirstOffsetNumber; offnum <= maxoff; You update the error callback phase to VACUUM_ERRCB_PHASE_SCAN_HEAP but I think we're already in that phase. I'm okay with explicitly setting it but on the other hand, we don't set the phase in heap_page_is_all_visible(). Is there any reason for that? Also, since we don't reset vacrelstats->offnum at the end of heap_page_is_all_visible(), if an error occurs by the end of lazy_vacuum_page(), the caller of heap_page_is_all_visible(), we report the error context with the last offset number in the page, making the users confused. --- @@ -2045,10 +2060,13 @@ lazy_check_needs_freeze(Buffer buf, bool *hastup) if (heap_tuple_needs_freeze(tupleheader, FreezeLimit, MultiXactCutoff, buf)) - return true; + break; } /* scan along page */ - return false; + /* Revert to the previous phase information for error traceback */ + restore_vacuum_error_info(vacrelstats, &saved_err_info); + + return offnum <= maxoff ? true : false; } I think we can write just "return (offnum <= maxoff)". --- - /* Revert back to the old phase information for error traceback */ + /* Revert to the old phase information for error traceback */ If we want to modify this comment how about the following phrase for consistency with other places? /* Revert to the previous phase information for error traceback */ Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services