Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes: > On 1 Aug 2020, at 09:06, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: >> AFAICR the feedback is that the Expect perl module is not welcome, which >> seems to suggest that it would have to be re-implemented somehow. This is >> not my dev philosophy, I won't do that, so I'm sorry to say that psql >> coverage will remain pretty abysmal.
> Re-reading this thread, I see no complaints about introducing a dependency on > Expect. The feedback returned in this case is that the patch hasn't applied > since March, and that the patch is more than welcome to be re-entered in the > next CF once it does. Personally, I'd object to introducing a hard dependency on Expect, as there are no doubt a lot of developers and buildfarm members who don't have that installed. But I see no reason we couldn't skip some tests if it's lacking, as we're already doing with IO::Pty in 010_tab_completion.pl. That does raise the question of whether Expect makes things enough easier than raw IO::Pty that it's worth adding that dependency (and hence foregoing the tests on some machines). But I'm prepared to be convinced on that point. regards, tom lane