Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes:
> On 1 Aug 2020, at 09:06, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>> AFAICR the feedback is that the Expect perl module is not welcome, which 
>> seems to suggest that it would have to be re-implemented somehow. This is 
>> not my dev philosophy, I won't do that, so I'm sorry to say that psql 
>> coverage will remain pretty abysmal.

> Re-reading this thread, I see no complaints about introducing a dependency on
> Expect.  The feedback returned in this case is that the patch hasn't applied
> since March, and that the patch is more than welcome to be re-entered in the
> next CF once it does.

Personally, I'd object to introducing a hard dependency on Expect, as
there are no doubt a lot of developers and buildfarm members who don't
have that installed.  But I see no reason we couldn't skip some tests
if it's lacking, as we're already doing with IO::Pty in
010_tab_completion.pl.

That does raise the question of whether Expect makes things enough
easier than raw IO::Pty that it's worth adding that dependency (and
hence foregoing the tests on some machines).  But I'm prepared to be
convinced on that point.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to