On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:38 PM Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Jul 30, 2020, at 5:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 6:10 PM Mark Dilger > Since I can't think of a plausible concrete example of corruption which would > elicit the problem I was worrying about, I'll withdraw the argument. But > that leaves me wondering about a comment that Andres made upthread: > > > On Apr 20, 2020, at 12:42 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > I don't think random interspersed uses of CLogTruncationLock are a good > > idea. If you move to only checking visibility after tuple fits into > > [relfrozenxid, nextXid), then you don't need to take any locks here, as > > long as a lock against vacuum is taken (which I think this should do > > anyway).
The version of the patch I'm looking at doesn't seem to mention CLogTruncationLock at all, so I'm confused about the comment. But what it is that you are wondering about exactly? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
