> 24 июля 2020 г., в 14:05, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> написал(а):
>
> Attached is the patch that adds heap_force_kill(regclass, tid[]) and
> heap_force_freeze(regclass, tid[]) functions which Robert mentioned in the
> first email in this thread. The patch basically adds an extension named
> pg_surgery that contains these functions. Please have a look and let me know
> your feedback. Thank you.
Thanks for the patch!
I have just few random thoughts.
I think here we should report that we haven't done what was asked.
+ /* Nothing to do if the itemid is unused or already
dead. */
+ if (!ItemIdIsUsed(itemid) || ItemIdIsDead(itemid))
+ continue;
Also, should we try to fix VM along the way?
Are there any caveats with concurrent VACUUM? (I do not see any, just asking)
It would be good to have some checks for interrupts in safe places.
I think we should not trust user entierly here. I'd prefer validation and
graceful exit, not a core dump.
+ Assert(noffs <= PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(page));
For some reason we had unlogged versions of these functions. But I do not
recall exact rationale..
Also, I'd be happy if we had something like "Restore this tuple iff this does
not break unique constraint". To do so we need to sort tids by xmin\xmax, to
revive most recent data first.
Thanks!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
