On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:06 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:32 AM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 8:37 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I have just notice that the parallelism is off even for the select > > > part of the query mentioned in the $subject. I see the only reason it > > > is not getting parallel because we block the parallelism if the query > > > type is not SELECT. I don't see any reason for not selecting the > > > parallelism for this query. > > > > There's a relevant comment near the top of heap_prepare_insert(). > > > > I think that is no longer true after commits 85f6b49c2c and 3ba59ccc89 > where we have allowed relation extension and page locks to conflict > among group members. We have accordingly changed comments at a few > places but forgot to update this one. I will check and see if any > other similar comments are there which needs to be updated. >
The attached patch fixes the comments. Let me know if you think I have missed anything or any other comments. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
0001-Fix-comments-in-heapam.c.patch
Description: Binary data
