On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:20 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> writes: > > The patchset is attached, sorry for the delay. > > > The first patch improves error messages, which appears to be unclear > > for me. If one applies .double() method to a numeric value, we > > restrict that this numeric value should fit to double precision type. > > If it doesn't fit, the current error message just says the following. > > > ERROR: jsonpath item method .double() can only be applied to a numeric value > > > But that's confusing, because .double() method is naturally applied to > > a numeric value. Patch makes this message explicitly report that > > numeric value is out of range for double type. This patch also adds > > test exercising this error. When string can't be converted to double > > precision, I think it's better to explicitly say that we expected > > valid string representation of double precision type. > > I see your point here, but the English of the replacement error messages > could be improved. I suggest respectively > > numeric argument of jsonpath item method .%s() is out of range for type > double precision > > string argument of jsonpath item method .%s() is not a valid representation > of a double precision number
Good, thank you for corrections! > As for 0002, I'd rather see the convertJsonbScalar() code changed back > to the way it was, ie just > > case jbvNumeric: > numlen = VARSIZE_ANY(scalarVal->val.numeric); > padlen = padBufferToInt(buffer); > ... > > There is no argument for having an its-not-NaN assertion here when > there aren't similar assertions throughout the jsonb code. > > Also, it seems like it'd be smart to reject isinf() and isnan() results > from float8in_internal_opt_error in both executeItemOptUnwrapTarget code > paths, ie numeric source as well as string source. Yeah, we don't expect > to see those cases in a jbvNumeric (so I wouldn't change the error message > text), but it's cheap insurance. OK, corrected as you proposed. > No other comments. Revised patches are attached. I understand both patches as fixes and propose to backpatch them to 12 if no objections. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
0001-Improve-error-reporting-for-jsonpath-.double-metho-2.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-Forbid-numeric-NaN-in-jsonpath-2.patch
Description: Binary data