Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes: > On 7/2/20 5:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I still can't get excited about contorting the code to remove that >> issue.
> It doesn't seem much worse than the oom test that was there before -- see
> attached.
Personally I would not bother, but it's your patch.
> Are we in agreement that whatever gets pushed should be backpatched through
> pg11
> (see start of thread)?
OK by me.
regards, tom lane
