[ just to tie back to this old thread ]
I wrote:
> I poked into this area for awhile, and it turns out to be even a
> worse can of worms than I thought. I looked through gram.y and
> parse_expr.c, and identified several distinct classes of issue.
> (I'm not promising that I found everything.)
In fact, the thread at [1] identifies an essentially similar class
of issue that I missed: JOIN ... USING (x) also implicitly looks up
an equality operator by seeing what "tab1.x = tab2.x" resolves as.
This is much like the CASE situation, in that there's no
SQL-standard-compliant way to reverse-list a view containing
such a construct while showing how it was resolved. We'd need
to invent some new syntax if we want to make this safer.
regards, tom lane
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAC35HNnNGavaZ%3DP%3DrUcwTwYEhfoyXDg32REXCRDgxBmC3No3nA%40mail.gmail.com
