Greetings, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 7/1/20 7:00 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > >> ... extensions outside of PG simply don't thrive as independent projects. > >> > >> There's various potential reasons for that, from being hard to find, to > >> being hard to install and work with, to the fact that we don't have a > >> centralized extension system (PGXN isn't really endorsed at all by > >> core... and I don't really think it should be), and our general > >> extension management system isn't particularly great anyway. > > > Then these are things we should fix. But the right fix isn't including > > every extension in the core code. > > Yeah. We *must not* simply give up on extensibility and decide that > every interesting feature has to be in core. I don't have any great > ideas about how we grow the wider Postgres development community and > infrastructure, but that certainly isn't the path to doing so.
I don't see where I was either proposing that we give up extensibility, or that we have to include every extension in the core code. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
